1. Right Answer: A
Explanation: Answer option A is correct.The individual filing the claim has 180 days from the date of the alleged violation. In some instances the 180-day limitation may be extended to 300 days if the charge is covered by a state or local anti-discrimination law.Answer option B is incorrect. The limit is 180 days, not 30 days.Answer option C is incorrect. The limit is 180 days, not 60 days.Answer option D is incorrect. The limit is 180 days, not 90 days.Guide, HR Certification Institute, ISBN: 978-1-586-44149-4, Section III, The US HR Body of Knowledge.Chapter: Employee and Labor RelationsObjective: Federal Employment Legislation
2. Right Answer: A
Explanation: Answer option A is correct.Right-to-work states, as addressed in the Taft-Hartley Act, state that employees aren't required to join a union in order to work.Answer option B is incorrect. This isn't a valid statement as employees aren't required to join a union in order to work.Answer option D is incorrect. The Taft-Hartley does allow employers to fire supervisors who are engaged in union activities or do not support the employer's position.Answer option C is incorrect. The union does not conduct the hiring process for the organization.Guide, HR Certification Institute, ISBN: 978-1-586-44149-4, Section III, The US HR Body of Knowledge.Chapter: Employee and Labor RelationsObjective: Labor Relations
3. Right Answer: D
Explanation: Answer option D is correct.The Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Service, Inc. is the Supreme Court case that found that sexual harassment under Title VII was written to protect women, should be applicable to both sexes.Answer options B, A, and C are incorrect. These aren't valid answers for the case. It was a lawsuit that centered on a man being sexually harassed by other men in the workforce.Reference: Professional in Human Resources Certification Guide, Sybex, ISBN: 978-0-470-43096-5. Chapter 7: Employee and Labor Relations. Official PHR andSPHR Certification Guide, HR Certification Institute, ISBN: 978-1-586-44149-4, Section III, The US Body of Knowledge.Chapter: Employee and Labor RelationsObjective: Federal Employment Legislation
4. Right Answer: B
Explanation: Answer option B is correct.Once management and union are in agreement with the terms of the contract and they sign the agreement, new demands or negotiations are not allowed. The contract is zipped closed for its duration.Answer option C, D, and A are incorrect. These are'nt valid definitions of the zipper clause.Guide, HR Certification Institute, ISBN: 978-1-586-44149-4, Section III, The US HR Body of Knowledge.Chapter: Employee and Labor RelationsObjective: Union Organization
5. Right Answer: B
Explanation: Answer option B is correct.The Weingarten Right is a right based on the US Supreme Court case NLRB v. Weingarten in 1975. This case establishes the right of a union member employee to have a union representative present at investigatory meetings with management.Answer option C is incorrect. The bumping right is the right of a senior employee whose position may be eliminated, and who opts to take the position of a less senior employee instead of losing the employment altogether.The less senior employee is 'bump' out of employment by the senior employee.Answer option D is incorrect. Right of way is not a valid term for this scenario.Answer option A is incorrect. Management rights describe the ability of management to manage their organization the way they see fit unless the management approach contradicts a union labor contract.Guide, HR Certification Institute, ISBN: 978-1-586-44149-4, Section III, The US HR Body of Knowledge.Chapter: Employee and Labor RelationsObjective: Employee Relations
Leave a comment